|
Health Mailbox
Columnist
Tara Parker-Pope answers readers' questions.
April 27, 2004; Page D4
Q: I saw your article
about trans fats. Recently, however, I read something that confused
me. Does peanut butter contain trans fat? Does it make a difference
if it's made with fully hydrogenated oils rather than partially
hydrogenated?
A: To answer this question, I checked in with
experts at the Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition as
well as the Peanut Institute. Trans fats are a particularly heart-unhealthy
fat created during hydrogenation, a process that uses hydrogen to
make fat more solid. Partially hydrogenated oils are soft, like
margarine. The more completely you hydrogenate oil, the more solid
it gets and the less trans fat it contains.
But because fully hydrogenated oil is solid and waxy,
it cannot be used in most foods. The terms partially hydrogenated
and hydrogenated tend to be used interchangeably, so if a food's
label says it contains partially hydrogenated oils or hydrogenated
oils, it contains some level of trans fat.
|
HEALTH JOURNAL
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrogenated oils are added to peanut butter to keep
its natural oils from separating. But the added hydrogenated oils
make up only 1% to 2% of the ingredients. Furthermore, the added
oils are nearly completely hydrogenated and therefore less trans-fat
content. A 2001 U.S. Department of Agriculture study of 11 peanut-butter
brands found that the amount of trans fat added was so small it
was undetectable, accounting for less than 0.01% of the sample.
The Peanut Institute says that under FDA labeling requirements,
regular peanut-butter brands can claim zero trans fats because the
amount is less than 0.5 gram per serving.
Consumers can buy natural peanut butter, which contains
no trans fat whatsoever. But if you still prefer the regular kind,
don't worry. The amount of trans fat you're getting is negligible.
Says Alice Lichtenstein, director of Tufts cardiovascular nutrition
laboratory: "Better someone to have standard peanut butter
than a bologna sandwich high in saturated fat."
* * *
Q: Thank you for clarifying the hazards
of television viewing for toddlers. My wife and I diligently
avoid watching television when our two-year-old son and eight-month-old
daughter are awake. We do listen to a lot of music, and it frequently
plays in the background when our children are playing. Should we
turn off the stereo as well?
A: I took your question to Dan Anderson, the
University of Massachusetts-Amherst professor who has led research
on television and child development. While Dr. Anderson has shown
that TV in the background can be disruptive to children's play,
it's not known whether music has the same effect. "There is
some research that indicates that homes that have a lot of sound
-- from any source -- have kids who don't develop as well as kids
from quieter homes," Dr. Anderson says.
But before you turn your house into a total quiet
zone, remember a key concern is whether television or music is interfering
with your interaction with your child. Are you listening more to
the music than to your child? Or does the music inspire you to pick
up your toddler and dance with him or her? Most experts believe
the biggest negative of media isn't the media itself, but the fact
that it can interrupt normal parent-child interactions.
Another reader asked whether leaving the television
on but turning off the sound -- the way many people watch sporting
events -- would have any impact on kids. Dr. Anderson has proposed
a study of that very issue. So while we don't know the answer yet,
stay tuned.
***
Q: Have you seen any data on the effect
of the "Baby Einstein" videos on very young children
A: We know the so-called Mozart effect --
the idea that children become smarter by listening to classical
musical, has been debunked. As for the popular Baby Mozart and Baby
Einstein videos, "there's no evidence that babies learn anything
from them at all," Dr. Anderson says.
But there's no evidence that the videos are bad for
baby either. Again, the only real concern is whether time spent
watching baby videos interferes with physical play or time spent
with a parent. Experts point out that the videos are slow-paced,
so there's little worry about overstimulation. In addition, babies
have short attention spans and are unlikely to watch for very long.
The reality is that a baby video is harmless, and can buy parents
a few minutes to run to change the wash or just enjoy "down
time" with their child.
You can e-mail Tara
Parker-Pope at healthjournal@wsj.com.
|