Beef Industry's Dirty
Secret:
U.S. Lags on Safety Standards
When a mad cow was found in Canada last week, the
government and cattle industry were quick to play down the risk
to the rest of us.
That's understandable. After all, the known risks
of contracting mad-cow disease are immeasurably small -- one cow
in Canada doesn't change that. In addition, if you're listing the
risks associated with eating beef, you would have to put heart disease
and colon cancer well above mad-cow disease.
But don't chow down on that burger just yet. The
discovery of the first North American mad cow in a decade sheds
light on a dirty secret of the American beef industry: The U.S.
and Canada have yet to adopt the strictest mad-cow safety standards
embraced in Europe and elsewhere. The practice of grinding up animals
and feeding them to other animals -- believed to be the way mad-cow
disease spread to humans in the first place -- still goes on in
North America. As a result, the risk of mad cow finding its way
into the U.S. may not be quite as low as the beef industry would
like people to believe.
So does this mean we should all stop eating beef?
Probably not. But it does make sense to educate yourself about mad-cow
disease and the ways you can further lower your risk. Here are some
answers that can help.
What does a mad cow in Canada have to do with
U.S. beef? The government and cattle industry have been quick
to point out that the sick cow was in another country. But the U.S.
and Canadian cattle industries are inextricably linked: The U.S.
imported 1.7 million head of Canadian cattle last year. And the
one billion pounds of Canadian beef we import account for about
4% of U.S. beef consumption.
Also, while it's true that no mad cow has been found
on U.S. soil, a similar disease has been found here in deer, elk
and mink.
How does mad cow spread? Mad cow likely is
spread by an infectious agent called a prion, largely found in the
brain and spinal cord of a diseased animal. The disease, bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), bores holes into the animal's brain
and is always fatal. In humans, the disease, known as variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob
Disease or vCJD, is equally fatal. It's believed the disease spread
because cattle were fed the recycled remains of infected sheep and
cattle.
But didn't the U.S. ban those feeding practices?
Yes, but loopholes remain. The ban means cattle, sheep, goats and
deer can't be given feed that contains protein made from similar
animals.
But these animals still can be turned into food for
chickens, pigs and pets. Chicken and pigs can still be fed back
to cattle. And bovine blood is still fed to calves. All this means
it's still theoretically possible for a U.S. cow to consume infected
material. In other countries, the practice of recycling animals
for feed is banned altogether.
A scathing report from the General Accounting Office
last year found the Food and Drug Administration had done a lousy
job enforcing the limited ban. The office found cases where firms
repeatedly failed to properly label feed that contained the banned
protein. They sometimes continued to include the banned proteins
in cattle feeds.
Federal officials say enforcement agencies have since
stepped up their monitoring of mad-cow safety rules. The USDA has
criticized the GAO report, saying it failed to take into account
a Harvard study the USDA funded, which found the risk of BSE occurring
in the U.S. is extremely low. "The public health threat in
the United States from BSE is vanishingly small," FDA Deputy
Commissioner Lester Crawford says.
Aren't the riskiest parts of the cow kept out
of the food supply? Not always. Cow brains, spinal cords and
central-nervous-system tissue pose the highest risk. Cow brains,
banned in Europe, still are sold in the U.S. In addition, cuts of
meat with bone, such as a T-bone steak, are stripped directly from
the animal's vertebrae and may contain portions of the spinal cord.
Finally, some plants use high-pressure water and
air or scraping methods to remove meat bits off a cow carcass. The
recovered bits are added to hotdogs and low-quality hamburger. A
USDA survey last year found more than one-third of products that
contained this type of meat also contained some central-nervous-system
tissue. In March, the USDA announced a stepped-up monitoring program
aimed at keeping spinal-cord tissue out of meats. But critics want
this meat-recovery method banned entirely, as it has been in Britain.
Aren't animals in this country tested for mad
cow? The U.S. tests far fewer animals than do many countries.
Last year, 20,000 U.S. cattle were tested, three times more than
the previous year. But in Europe, they test more than 20,000 animals
a day. Japan tests every bovine that enters the food supply. U.S.
officials note testing here far exceeds standards required for a
country where mad cow has never been found. Critics contend it isn't
enough. "You can't find what you're not looking hard enough
for," says Michael Greger, BSE coordinator for the Organic
Consumers Association.
Are there less-risky ways to eat beef? If
you're worried, avoid meat-on-bone products like t-bone steak, as
well as hamburgers, hotdogs and sausage. Instead, eat only whole,
boneless cuts. For hamburger, ask a trusted butcher to grind steak
for you, or grind it at home. Many experts suggest avoiding venison
altogether. Organic meats are an option, because they should come
from farms where animals are fed only grains and grasses.